Friday, November 2, 2007

Abomination in a Holy Place?

What is the Abomination in a Holy Place?

"Likewise English speaking Nazarenes could have discerned that this oversight concerning the sacred name "Joshua," by those errant scholars, may have been indicative of a subtle collective bias which has traditionally permeated latinized Christianity, which bias seems to be reflected in this errant KJV text, as those scholars ought to have been able to discern even from their own Hebrew Old Testaments, that the biblical Savior's sacred name was the Semitic "Joshua," but refrained from testifing thus, before all, solidifying this Latin/Romanist profanity "Jesus/Iesus" in Protestant Christian tradition even unto these modern times." (end quote)

My point here is any Christian who died, during the time of the KJV, not knowing Yahshua's real English name "Joshua" and thus not using his real name, is technically not saved, but by Grace, as Yahweh knows many of them would have taken the real name, HAD THEY KNOWN IT, but were DENIED THIS SAVING KNOWLEDGE, simply because the translators purposefully SUPPLANTED the real name Joshua with the anglicized version of the Latin name of Iesus, "Jesus". Once this Saving Truth is revealed, those who continue to deny it unto death are denying the holy Spirit and Saving Truth: these most likely are the diehard Trinitarians who just don't get it.

The intriguing thing about this peculiar SUPPLANTING, ie. "placement of Unsaving Truth in the place where Saving Truth ought to have been", allowed by Yah, is that it is spiritually an "abomination (the name of the Babylonian Savior Tammuz/pagan deity), in a holy place", ie. in the place of the sacred Saving name of Salvation! The name of Condemnation, in the place where the name of Pardon ought to be. Thus this Saving Truth is the most sensitive of them all, and thus "they will be hated for my name's sake." It's all about the sacred name. Satan goes to ALOT of trouble to obscure these Saving Truths.

It is our job as Nazarenes to REMOVE THE ABOMINATION! Thus I like to teach, "What is this Abomination that Yahweh hates?" It is Sun/Nature Worship, the worship of the created being ("the creature"), instead of the worship of the Almighty Creator: this Abomination thus violates the first Four Commandments right off the bat, including the Sabbath, which the Abomination/Papal See has obscurred with their Sunday Sabbath, to Protestants. If you are a Catholic, or a Trinitarian Protestant, bingo, Satan has you violating those first four commandments WITH IMPUNITY. And it is IMPUNITY TO SIN which merits anyone the Second Death/Gehenna. The name controversy puts all on the spot, to choose either Saving Truth, or not.

There never was nor will be Salvation/Pardon, in the name of the Babylonian Tammuz or his modern day Latin counterpart Iesus/Esus/Jesus of Rome. Neither is there salvation in any superstitious and traditional concepts of Romanism/Babylonian Nature/Sun Worship.

This Controversy is simply about WHO we bow the knee to, whether our First Authority be the First Cosmic Authority, the Almighty Creator Yahweh; or that infamous lesser SECULAR or worldly authority of Great Babylon, the Roman Temple.

Who denies Yahshua simply because of the Lies by that lesser secular Roman Authority, believing those lies are "of the Nazarene" (which they are not), is likewise bowing the knee to this lesser authority, and not to the Greater Authority of Yah which is discerned by truthful and actual Saving Truth. So this includes even all the Atheists who hate Christianity simply because of that sinister influence of Romanism, AS IF ROMANISM IS THE AUTHORITY ON THE SUBJECT, which true Nazarenes know is not the case.

Thus this Great Controversy's pivotal point IS the Sacred Saving Names of Yahweh and Yahshua; versus the UNsaving UNsacred Latin names of the Antichrist Tammuz/Iesus/Esus.

No comments: